On Wed, 2005-12-10 at 23:46 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Agreed. I have changed them both to stable. I think xslt_process()
> should be stable because it is unlikely you would want a URL's contents
> to change inside a transaction
Why is it "unlikely"?
If a function's return value for a particular set of arguments could
change within a single table scan, the function is volatile -- ISTM
xslt_process() clearly falls within that definition.
-Neil
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
