Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2005-25-10 at 17:43 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What I suggest we do about this is change addImplicitRTE() to set
>> inFromCl true for implicitly added RTEs, so that the view rule will
>> later be dumped as if the query had been written per spec.
> Sounds reasonable. I wonder if this should be backpatched -- ISTM the
> proper representation of the view is with an explicit FROM list anyway,
I think it'd be reasonable to back-patch it into the branches that have
the add_missing_from variable (how far back did we add that?). But that
won't fix the problem with incompatible dump files from existing
installations.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
