Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Keep in mind that the addition of the interval_justify_hours() did > > generate some regression test changes, so removing > > interval_justify_hours() might just take the results back to what we had > > in 8.0. > > Not hardly. I tried already. The existing timestamp_mi behavior is > probably as close to 8.0 as we can get given the change in underlying > representation.
You mean the '6432 hours' is a worse change, OK. > > I guess my point is that we are changing 8.0.X behavior so we better be > > sure it is now the way we want it to remain. > > [ shrug... ] We've changed datetime behavior in every past release, > we're changing it for 8.1, we'll probably change it some more for 8.2, > and again after that. All the datetime code is a work in progress. > Get used to it. OK, as long as we are sure we are not going to change it back to 8.0 behavior. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
