Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 2005-11-03 at 10:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think we could make it go by cramming the sign and
>> the high-order dscale bit into the first NumericDigit --- the
>> digit itself can only be 0..9999 so there are a couple of bits
>> to spare.
> I've got a working version of the code using the above scheme,
Really? After I woke up a bit more I realized there was only one bit
and change to spare, not two, so I don't see how it would work.
(Unless you want to force a minimum of two NumericDigits when the dscale
exceeds 255, and flag the scale in the second one --- which might be OK
but it's getting messier and messier...)
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
