I wrote:
> ... the most straightforward thing to do is define an empty element
> as meaning a NULL. But this might be objected to on a couple of grounds:
I just thought of another, potentially fatal objection: it's ambiguous
whether '{}'::text[] should be taken to mean an empty (zero-length)
array or an array containing a single NULL element.
For backwards compatibility it should mean an empty array, but then
there's no way to represent ARRAY(NULL) in data dumps, which won't
do either.
The only workaround that comes to mind is to allow explicit
specification of what's meant: '[1:1]{}' would be needed to represent
the one-null case. Ugly.
Ideas anyone?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
