On 11/11/05, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: > Guys, > > > I understand you well... what i was trying to say is that i prefer > > MERGE (standard SQL command) to be done because the functionally it > > has (basically a merge of two tables) seems to me to be more usefull > > than REPLACE (MySql Command)... > > But even REPLACE requires predicate locking. There's no real way to get > around it. > > --Josh >
why? seems that REPLACE only work if there are at least one row matching... -- Atentamente, Jaime Casanova (DBA: DataBase Aniquilator ;) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
