Jaime Casanova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If the lock will be required, what's the problem in doing it > internally?
I already explained that: lock upgrading is deadlock-prone.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
