I now notice that "pg_ctl -w start" fails if the postgres db is missing.
I am not sure that changing pg_ctl to use this rather than template1 was
a good thing, and it can't be overridden. I suggest we revert that
particular change - it seems to me to confer little to no benefit,
unlike the case with createdb etc.
cheers
andrew
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
It does seem a bit inconsistent that psql wouldn't connect to the
specified database in order to do -l, if one is specified.
Anyone want to look and see if it's easy to change?
options.action == ACT_LIST_DB && options.dbname == NULL ?
"postgres" : options.dbname
Tested, and worked fine.
Committed on Head and 8.1 branches.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
