Heikki, > 4. Don't increment xid counter, just use a single xid for all > transactions. Otherwise we might reach the xid wrap-around point, and we > can't vacuum. It seems safe to me, am I missing anything?
Well, it eliminates transaction isolation. Completely. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster