Heikki,

> 4. Don't increment xid counter, just use a single xid for all
> transactions. Otherwise we might reach the xid wrap-around point, and we
> can't vacuum. It seems safe to me, am I missing anything?

Well, it eliminates transaction isolation.  Completely.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to