Sorry for the top post. If you can get a UDK license, that will work better.

LER

On Nov 22, 2005, at 12:02 PM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:

Sorry for answering this late.

2005/11/16, Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
The SCO compiler is so buggy (and for so many years) I see no reason
to even look at a bug report from someone using it.


I **REALLY** wish you would STOP saying that, Bruce. The current OpenServer Compiler (UDK), is the same as on UnixWare, and is **MUCH** better than the
Old SVR3 compiler.

We **REALLY** **SHOULD** look at it.

I'll take the bug report directly to SCO if I get enough detail.


I was using cc, exactly "SCO UNIX Development System  Release 5.1.2A
27Jul00". Last week, I tried with "UX:i386cc: INFO: SCO UNIX
Development System  Release 5.2.0A 07Oct05" but I had the same
results. I think I'm doing something wrong but I don't know what.

I launched postgres in standalone mode and a core file is created. I
used gdb on it to see the backtrace :
(gdb) bt
#0  0x081bf5fd in booltestsel ()
#1  0x08141125 in clause_selectivity ()
#2  0x081409d2 in clauselist_selectivity ()
#3  0x0814295b in set_baserel_size_estimates ()
#4  0x0813ff42 in set_plain_rel_pathlist ()
#5  0x0813ff12 in set_base_rel_pathlists ()
#6  0x0813fe1d in make_one_rel ()
#7  0x0814b455 in query_planner ()
#8  0x0814bfa0 in grouping_planner ()
#9  0x0814ba11 in subquery_planner ()
#10 0x0814b6c7 in planner ()
#11 0x08181e07 in pg_plan_query ()
#12 0x08181ea0 in pg_plan_queries ()
#13 0x081820ce in exec_simple_query ()
#14 0x081849dd in PostgresMain ()
#15 0x08161d92 in BackendRun ()
#16 0x081616c9 in BackendStartup ()
#17 0x0815fba8 in ServerLoop ()
#18 0x0815f67c in PostmasterMain ()
#19 0x08127d91 in main ()
#20 0x08074d1a in _start ()


--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-351-4152                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to