Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Log Message:
> > -----------
> > Add comments about why errno is set to zero.
>
> These comments seem a bit wrongheaded, since "checking
> LONG_MIN/LONG_MAX" is exactly not what we could do to detect an overflow
> error.
Yea, I noticed the 0 was listed as another value that needs to be
checked. Should I just change them all to:
errno = 0; /* avoid checking result for failure */
or should I add a macro to c.h as:
/* Sometimes we need to clear errno so we can check errno
* without having to check for a failure value from the function
* call.
*/
#define CLEAR_ERRNO \\
do { \
errno = 0; \\
while (0);
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
