Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes:
> > Tom, did you implement this functionality in *printf?
> > The size may be given as zero to find out how many characters are
> > needed; in this case, the str argument is ignored. Sprintf() and
> > vsprintf() effectively assume an infinite size.
>
> Where do you read that? The SUS says the opposite:
>
> If the value of n is zero on a call to snprintf(), an unspecified
> value less than 1 is returned.
>
> and that's what our code implements.
I got it from the BSD/OS manual page, and in the NetBSD manual page I
see:
If size is zero, nothing is written and str may be a NULL pointer.
and:
Upon successful completion snprintf() and vsnprintf() return the number
of characters that would have been written to a sufficiently sized str,
excluding the terminating NUL character.
but it seems this is some BSD'ism that we don't need to support if the
standard doesn't say so.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
[email protected] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
