Simon Riggs wrote: > From what's been said VACUUM FREEZE will not alter the fact that a > frozen table will need vacuuming again in the future and so cannot ever > be read-only. I can't really see any reason to run VACUUM FREEZE...
Yeah. > If you want to make a table read-only forever, we need a separate > command to do that, ISTM. Let's get this goose cooked and then we can improve it. This patch has been waiting on my queue for too long. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
