Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is some stuff in the literature about how to make transformations
> of the last kind, but it requires additional executor smarts to do strange
> sorts of "generalized outer join" operations.
Would these "generalized outer join" operations be general enough to handle IN
semantics? Or other subqueries?
--
greg
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
