Manuel Sugawara <masm@fciencias.unam.mx> writes: > (Some time ago I proposed an--incomplete--patch and it was rejectd by > Karel arguing that to_char functions should behave *exactly* the same > way that they do in Oracle.)
That is the accepted plan for to_char ... of course, if Oracle changes to_char every so often, it'll get more interesting to decide what to do. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend