Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 04:59:45PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > > Looking before that, the 64-bit registers are now prefixed with 'r'
> > > > instead of 'e', so what I did was to convert all the long/l assembler
> > > > instructions to quad/64-bit/q, and rename the registers to use 64-bit
> > > > versions. I also modified the function alignment from 4 to 8, patch
> > > > attached.  Please give it a try and report back any error lines.
> > > 
> > > Surely that breaks it for the i386 case --- don't we need a separate
> > > solaris_x86_64.s source file?
> > 
> > Yes, it is only for him to test.  But his email bounced back so it is
> > possible he isn't going to be back.  :-(
> 
> Sorry, I don't remember the history of this thread, but I do have access
> to solaris on an opteron if something needs to be tested.

If you set up Solaris in 64-bit mode, and are using the Sun compiler,
please test the patch I posted and let me know if it compiles:

        http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-12/msg00275.php

-- 
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to