--- Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> escreveu:
> However,
> GRANT SELECT ON TABLE table1 TO someuser;
> ... works, while ....
> GRANT SELECT ON SEQUENCE table1_id_seq TO someuser;
> ... raises an error.
>
> This is inconsistent. Do people agree with me that the parser
> should
> accept "SEQUENCE" there, since the optional object name works for all
>
> other objects? Is there some technical reason this is difficult to
> do?
>
It should but it's not implemented yet. There is no difficulty in doing
it. But I want to propose the following idea: if some object depends on
another object and its type is 'DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL' we could
grant/revoke privileges automagically to it. Or maybe create another
type of dependency to do so.
Comments?
Euler Taveira de Oliveira
euler[at]yahoo_com_br
_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage.
http://br.yahoo.com/homepageset.html
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
