On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 14:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [ ... a large amount of analysis based on exactly one test case ... ]
[Hmmm, those are your opinions, not my words. Funny guy ;-) ] The one test case just happens to be a very common 1:M relationship, an example of which occurs within the TPC-H/DBT-3 test database. I picked that so it was an obvious publicly accessible test case, rather than an isolated customer issue that couldn't be aired fully. I was hoping to allow the problem to be explored and improved. > I think you are putting too much emphasis on fixing one case and not > enough on considering what may happen in other cases ... It's not just one problem, but knowing that you would accept only a detailed analysis, I researched that one case so that it was indisputable. > I'm dubious about the rest of this. Excellent. Much better than "It's Wrong." I'll write some code and run some tests. Thanks for reading it all; sorry it had to be so long. Best Regards, Simon Riggs ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
