On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 04:02:07PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 03:52:01PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Does anyone see a reason to keep this layer of struct > >> definitions? > > > If you cut it out, what will the "heap" and "index" access methods > > needed for SQL/MED use? > > What's that have to do with this?
I'm sure you'll correct me if I'm mistaken, but this is a candidate for the spot where such interfaces--think of Informix's Virtual (Table|Index) Interface--would go. Cheers, D -- David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/ phone: +1 415 235 3778 Remember to vote! ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
