On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 12:14:12PM -0800, David Scott wrote: > Do commercial databases implement MVCC in a way that allows an > efficient implementation of index lookups that can avoid heap lookups?
Oracle does, but you pay in other ways. Instead of keeping dead tuples in the main heap, they shuffle them off to an 'undo log'. This has some downsides: Rollbacks take *forever*, though this usually isn't much of an issue unless you need to abort a really big transaction. Every update/delete means two seperate writes to disk, one for the base table and one for the undo log (well, there's also the redo log, equivalent to our WAL). Though writes to undo can (and presumably are) grouped together, so they should normally be a lot more efficient than the updates to the base table unless you're updating data in table order. Of course there's downsides to our MVCC as well; the cost of index scans is just one. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
