Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Earlier, CreateOptsFile was called with argv, now it's passed the result of
> find_my_exec instead. I'm not sure whether that change was wrong to begin
> with or whether find_my_exec is mishaving (it should return something
> containing "postmaster", no?).
find_my_exec is not misbehaving: it's designed to expand symlinks, and
would in fact be pretty useless if it did not. We could go back to
storing the raw value of argv[0] in the opts file, but I rather like
having the full path in there.
There is another possible answer, and it's something I've been meaning
to bring up for awhile. Is there a good reason why postmaster is a
symlink to postgres, rather than a hard link? Surely the symlink way
is not any more efficient. The thing that ticks me off about this
is that it confuses gdb: if you say "gdb postmaster" and then "run",
what gets passed as argv[0] is "postgres", thus breaking your test.
So I not infrequently find myself manually replacing the symlink with
a hard link in order to be able to test. If it'd result in nicer
output in the opts file too, then all the more reason to change.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
