I wrote: > If this theory is correct, the bug has been there since the clog code > was first written. But the conditions for having it happen are narrow > enough that it's not too surprising we haven't seen it before.
Actually, there seem to be a couple of unresolved bug reports that look like the same thing ... http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-01/msg00216.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2005-12/msg00130.php http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2005-10/msg00975.php The spelling of the message has changed since 7.3, but the code behavior is still fundamentally the same. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
