Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hmmmm...actually. It's because I have a user called 'support' and a > group called 'support'.
This was discussed already. It's a corner case we didn't really think about while designing roles. It's possible to support this: the group and the user will now really be the same entity, ie a role that has both its own login privileges and members. However pg_dump isn't doing the right things to make the old situation morph into the new one. Want to write a patch? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly