Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I wonder if this would be an opportunity to fix Postgres's handling of > > addresses like '10.1'. > > You've mistaken this for a proposal to change the I/O behavior, which > it is specifically not. > > > The standard interpretation of this is the same as '10.0.0.1'. > > Standard according to whom? Paul Vixie evidently doesn't think that > that's a standard abbreviation, else the code we borrowed from libbind > would do it already.
Agreed. 10.1 as 10.0.0.1 is an old behavior which has been removed from most modern versions of networking tools. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
