On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:46:42PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The direction that we ought to be going in is to add separate fields to
> error reports that contain just the names of the relevant objects (without
> any other decoration). This is needed anyway to allow client-side
> programs to extract the information without having to parse human-readable
> text messages ... and IIRC it's required by some part of the SQL spec,
> too.
Agreed. I didn't know about that part but with this in mind it would be a
waste of time to check all of the the messages at this time and make them
conform in some way.
Thanks for the explanation,
Joachim
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
