Mark Woodward wrote:
"Mark Woodward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
One of the problems with the current PostgreSQL design is that all the
databases operated by one postmaster server process are interlinked at
some core level. They all share the same system tables. If one database
becomes corrupt because of disk or something, the whole cluster is
affected.
This problem is not as large as you paint it, because most of the system
catalogs are *not* shared.
Does anyone see this as useful?
Seriously? No use at all? You don't see any purpose in controlling and
managing multiple postgresql postmaster processes from one central point?
pgAdmin does so. IMHO it's totally sufficient to handle this on a client
side level.
Regards,
Andreas
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
