Tom Lane said: > Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How much time would you need? I think having every patch built before >> anyone even looks at the code would sort out most of the issues I >> mentioned. > > If I ran a buildfarm machine, I'd turn it off immediately if anyone > proposed setting up a system that would cause it to run code no one had > vetted... so I don't think the above will fly. It might or might not > be worth doing something with patches that have passed some kind of > initial review but aren't yet applied. >
Yes, I agree. Whast I had in mind was adding some sort of experimental branch to CVS. > IMHO the thing we are really seriously short of is patch reviewers. > Neil and Bruce and I seem to be the only ones doing that much at all, > and the main burden is falling on Bruce. More eyeballs would help much > more than throwing machines at the problem. > Unfortunately, demands from my real job increased enormously right at the time I was given commit privileges. I don't know when that will change. People can review without having commit privs, though. cheers andrew ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
