Josh,
On 2/18/06 7:38 AM, "Luke Lonergan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I figure they'll have to do quite a lot to make progress in their chosen
> market, including:
>
> - SQL*Net protocol compatibility
> - Oracle Number datatype support
> - ROWID unique row identifier
> - Oracle Redo/Undo log format parsing and replay
> - SQL Loader format support
> - Oracle exp/imp format support
I forgot one:
- Make sort ordering equivalent to Oracle (trailing blanks don't count, for
instance)
- Luke
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
