On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, I had another thought about this: if we go this way, then the plans
> associated with RI check queries would essentially always be trivial
> index lookups (for everything except RI_Initial_Check). It'd be within
> the realm of feasibility to throw away the current cached-plan RI
> infrastructure and simply do direct indexscans, in the style that we
> currently use for most system-catalog accesses.
Would we have to do anything odd if we want to be testing only some of the
index columns and possibly not in the index order (like match partial
where some of the fk side is null)? I don't honestly see us doing match
partial any time soon, but I'd like to have an idea of what'd be involved.
> If we did this then RI checks would no longer be subvertible by rules or
> user triggers.
I don't think that it'd really help because it's the actions that are
generally subvertible not the checks and since those are looking at the
potentially not indexed fk side, I don't think the above would apply.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
