Ühel kenal päeval, K, 2006-03-22 kell 21:50, kirjutas Andrew Dunstan: > Tom Lane said: > > Darcy Buskermolen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Wednesday 22 March 2006 13:11, Tom Lane wrote: > >>> (Thinks a bit...) Maybe it would work for pg_sequence to be a real > >>> catalog with a row per sequence, and we also create a view named > >>> after the sequence that simply selects from pg_sequence with an > >>> appropriate WHERE condition. > > > >> I'd think that would be a workable solution, with documentation notes > >> that this will be deprecated in favor of information_schema in an > >> upcoming release ? > > > > Yeah, we could consider the views a transitional thing, and get rid of > > them after a release or two. Tell people to change over to either look > > in the pg_sequence catalog, or use the information_schema view. Does > > that view expose everything that there is, though, or will we have > > proprietary extensions that are not in SQL2003? > > > > What happens to sequence ACLs?
perhaps we can keep pg_class part of seqs and just make the pg_class.relfilenode to point to row oid in pg_sequence table ? ------------- Hannu ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly