On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 07:54:09AM +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: > > Structure for the human-consumable output or for something that would be > > machine-parsed? ISTM it would be best to keep the current output as-is, > > and provide some other means for producing machine-friendly output, > > presumably in a table format. > > How about (well-formed) XML format? > Anyone menthioned in the past threads? > > I guess XML is good for the explain structure.
Unless you want to actually analyze the output in something like plpgsql, but I can certainly see uses for both. Perhaps getting one implimented will make it easier to implement the other. -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
