On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:17:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 11:08:11PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> If this is the story, then FBSD have broken their system and must revert > >> their change. They do not have kernel behavior that totally hides the > >> existence of the other process, and therefore having some calls that > >> pretend it's not there is simply inconsistent. > > > I'm guessing it's a deliberate change to prevent the information > > leakage between jails. > > I have no objection to doing that, so long as you are actually doing it > correctly. This example shows that each jail must have its own SysV > semaphore key space, else information leaks anyway.
By default SysV shared memory is disallowed in jails. Kris
pgpyArbJ1akOg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
