"Nicolas Barbier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2006/4/3, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> AFAICS there are no circumstances, ever, in which update-in-place is >> "safe". (No transaction can guarantee that it will commit.)
> Updates to row values that did not "escape" the currect transaction > yet (ie, rows that were created by or have their last value written by > the current transaction). Wrong, because MVCC also applies within transactions: a snapshot having a lower command counter than what you are executing at should not see your change. A typical example of this is that an update scan must not see tuples generated by triggers fired by that scan. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match