"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > "Qingqing Zhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > After this, the proc->sem will be bumped to 1 unexpectedly ... Since this > > problem is rare, a possible fix is to put a critical section around line 1 > > to 7 and remove UnlockBuffers() accordingly. > > No, that would make any attempt to control-C a VACUUM have a significant > probability for panicking the whole database. >
Why panicking by control-C? Is that critical section can prevent any signal processing? Regards, Qingqing ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
