Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have to agree with Martijn here too. It's not all that expensive to
> provide read/write calls to abstract away the specific library being
> used (since psqlODBC, at least, couldn't care less which library is
> being used, really)
You're failing to consider async applications. AFAICS, the *minimum*
API would be
read
write
read ready?
write ready?
get socket so I can use it in select()
(very possibly there's some stuff I missed, considering I haven't
consumed any caffeine yet today...). And that's just considering
the data transport aspect of it. I'm still concerned that SSL-using
apps may wish to twiddle the SSL library in ways we don't even know
about.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
