On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
Perhaps someone could check if changing the test explicitly check
against NULL:
((attnum) > (int) (tup)->t_data->t_natts) ? \
( \
(((isnull) != NULL)? (*(isnull) = true) : (dummyret)NULL), \
(Datum)NULL \
removes the warning. It seems silly for the GCC people to add warnings
for this kind of stuff without a simple way to bypass it...
Yes, this coding removes the warning.
Kris Jurka
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
