Gevik Babakhani wrote: > On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 23:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Why are we debating this? It won't get accepted anyway, because the > > whole thing is silly. Show me one other object type that we issue > > such warnings for, or anyone else who has even suggested that we should.
No other object type has the ability to require you to stop the server and start a standalone backend to fix the mistake, which is what makes this thing unique. > So, I am very much confused. What do I do now. Do you mean the whole > thing won't get accepted and I should stop developing the TODO item? or > just strip the warning part. Tom is referring to the WARNING. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
