REYNAUD Jean-Samuel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I use a "select for update" request whitch uses an index, the
> locking system is inconsistant.
I've applied the attached patch to HEAD and 8.1 to fix this.
regards, tom lane
Index: createplan.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c,v
retrieving revision 1.202.2.2
diff -c -r1.202.2.2 createplan.c
*** createplan.c 29 Jan 2006 18:55:55 -0000 1.202.2.2
--- createplan.c 25 Apr 2006 16:46:12 -0000
***************
*** 816,823 ****
* are not equal to, but are logically implied by, the index quals; so
we
* also try a predicate_implied_by() check to see if we can discard
quals
* that way. (predicate_implied_by assumes its first input contains
only
! * immutable functions, so we have to check that.) We can also
discard
! * quals that are implied by a partial index's predicate.
*
* While at it, we strip off the RestrictInfos to produce a list of
plain
* expressions.
--- 816,827 ----
* are not equal to, but are logically implied by, the index quals; so
we
* also try a predicate_implied_by() check to see if we can discard
quals
* that way. (predicate_implied_by assumes its first input contains
only
! * immutable functions, so we have to check that.)
! *
! * We can also discard quals that are implied by a partial index's
! * predicate, but only in a plain SELECT; when scanning a target
relation
! * of UPDATE/DELETE/SELECT FOR UPDATE, we must leave such quals in the
! * plan so that they'll be properly rechecked by EvalPlanQual testing.
*
* While at it, we strip off the RestrictInfos to produce a list of
plain
* expressions.
***************
*** 836,843 ****
if (predicate_implied_by(clausel, nonlossy_indexquals))
continue;
! if (predicate_implied_by(clausel,
best_path->indexinfo->indpred))
! continue;
}
qpqual = lappend(qpqual, rinfo->clause);
}
--- 840,853 ----
if (predicate_implied_by(clausel, nonlossy_indexquals))
continue;
! if (best_path->indexinfo->indpred)
! {
! if (baserelid != root->parse->resultRelation &&
! !list_member_int(root->parse->rowMarks,
baserelid))
! if (predicate_implied_by(clausel,
!
best_path->indexinfo->indpred))
! continue;
! }
}
qpqual = lappend(qpqual, rinfo->clause);
}
***************
*** 920,927 ****
* but are logically implied by, the index quals; so we also try a
* predicate_implied_by() check to see if we can discard quals that way.
* (predicate_implied_by assumes its first input contains only immutable
! * functions, so we have to check that.) We can also discard quals that
! * are implied by a partial index's predicate.
*
* XXX For the moment, we only consider partial index predicates in the
* simple single-index-scan case. Is it worth trying to be smart about
--- 930,941 ----
* but are logically implied by, the index quals; so we also try a
* predicate_implied_by() check to see if we can discard quals that way.
* (predicate_implied_by assumes its first input contains only immutable
! * functions, so we have to check that.)
! *
! * We can also discard quals that are implied by a partial index's
! * predicate, but only in a plain SELECT; when scanning a target
relation
! * of UPDATE/DELETE/SELECT FOR UPDATE, we must leave such quals in the
! * plan so that they'll be properly rechecked by EvalPlanQual testing.
*
* XXX For the moment, we only consider partial index predicates in the
* simple single-index-scan case. Is it worth trying to be smart about
***************
*** 945,952 ****
{
IndexPath *ipath = (IndexPath *)
best_path->bitmapqual;
! if (predicate_implied_by(clausel,
ipath->indexinfo->indpred))
! continue;
}
}
qpqual = lappend(qpqual, clause);
--- 959,972 ----
{
IndexPath *ipath = (IndexPath *)
best_path->bitmapqual;
! if (ipath->indexinfo->indpred)
! {
! if (baserelid !=
root->parse->resultRelation &&
!
!list_member_int(root->parse->rowMarks, baserelid))
! if
(predicate_implied_by(clausel,
!
ipath->indexinfo->indpred))
! continue;
! }
}
}
qpqual = lappend(qpqual, clause);
***************
*** 1282,1288 ****
* join quals; failing to prove that doesn't result in an
incorrect
* plan. It is the right way to proceed because adding more
quals to
* the stuff we got from the original query would just make it
harder
! * to detect duplication.
*/
BitmapHeapPath *innerpath = (BitmapHeapPath *)
best_path->innerjoinpath;
--- 1302,1310 ----
* join quals; failing to prove that doesn't result in an
incorrect
* plan. It is the right way to proceed because adding more
quals to
* the stuff we got from the original query would just make it
harder
! * to detect duplication. (Also, to change this we'd have to be
! * wary of UPDATE/DELETE/SELECT FOR UPDATE target relations; see
! * notes above about EvalPlanQual.)
*/
BitmapHeapPath *innerpath = (BitmapHeapPath *)
best_path->innerjoinpath;
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
