Tom Lane wrote:
> "Larry Rosenman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'd like to see a more concrete definition of what we
>> want Autovacuum to output and at what levels.
> 
> I would argue that what people typically want is
> 
>       (0)     nothing
> 
>       (1)     per-database log messages
> 
> or
> 
>       (2)     per-table log messages (including per-database)
> 
> The first problem is that (2) is only available at DEBUG2 or below,
> which is not good because that also clutters the log with a whole lot
> of implementer-level debugging info.
> 
> The second problem is that we don't really want to use the global
> log_min_messages setting to determine this, because that constrains
> your decision about how much chatter you want from ordinary backends.
> 
> I suggest that maybe the cleanest solution is to not use log level at
> all for this, but to invent a separate "autovacuum_verbosity" setting
> that controls how many messages autovac tries to log, using the above
> scale.  Anything it does try to log can just come out at LOG message
> setting.

This sounds like a winner to me.  Anyone else want to grab it?  I'm 
in the position to try and do this, but don't want to step on anyone
else's toes.

LER

> 
>                       regards, tom lane



-- 
Larry Rosenman
Database Support Engineer

PERVASIVE SOFTWARE. INC.
12365B RIATA TRACE PKWY
3015
AUSTIN TX  78727-6531

Tel: 512.231.6173
Fax: 512.231.6597
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.pervasive.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to