On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 12:34:42PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> 2. Run setRuleCheckAsUser during rule load rather than rule store.
> 
> #2 is a lot simpler, and would fix the problem for existing broken rules
> whereas #1 would not, so I'm kind of inclined to go with that.  I doubt
> there'd be any meaningful performance hit --- parsing the stored form
> of a rule is relatively expensive anyway, so we cache the results.

FWIW, I think #2 is better also. It's the easiest way to ensure the
correct result and the performence isn't enough of a problem to worry
about doing it a different way.

Have a nice day,

-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to 
> litigate.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to