On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:18:13AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > If the user is specifying the default expression, they can specify > > SECURITY DEFINER themselves, yes? > Not unless they write a wrapper function to be a security definer > and call nextval().
Ah. I was wondering about that. When I saw the first poster tag 'SECURITY DEFINER' on the end of the expression I assumed it was something that I didn't know you could do... :-) mark -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED] __________________________ . . _ ._ . . .__ . . ._. .__ . . . .__ | Neighbourhood Coder |\/| |_| |_| |/ |_ |\/| | |_ | |/ |_ | | | | | | \ | \ |__ . | | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__ | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them... http://mark.mielke.cc/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend