"Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > While refactoring the patch, I've noticed that this patch allowed > pg_resetxlog to proceed while the server could potentially be up... is > this the desired behavior or should we require the lock file to be > removed first (as it was prior to this patch)?
Definitely bad, very bad. Please put back the lock-checking code. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster