Peter Eisentraut skrev:
Am Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2006 10:10 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout:
You want to make a GUC that makes:
BEGIN;
BEGIN;
Leave you with an aborted transaction? That seems like a singularly
useless feature...
If a command doesn't do what it is supposed to do, then it should be an error.
That seems like a throroughly useful feature to me.
And it would follow sql99 that demand an error. I'm surprised
everyone seems to ignore that part (except maybe Peter who is the
one I happend to reply to :-).
A guc that people can turn off if they have old broken code, that
would work for me.
/Dennis
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
