Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> Clever idea, pity we can't use it (what's the bet it's patented?). I'd
> wager anything beyond simple compression is patented by someone.
You're in for a rude awakening: even "simple compression" is anything
but simple. As I said, it's a minefield of patents. I recall reading a
very long statement by one of the zlib developers (Jean-loup Gailly, I
think) explaining exactly how they had threaded their way through that
minefield, and why they were different enough from half-a-dozen
similar-looking patented methods to not infringe any of them.
I feel fairly confident that zlib is patent-free, first because they did
their homework and second because they've now been out there and highly
visible for a good long time without getting sued. I've got no such
confidence in any other random algorithm you might choose --- in fact,
I'm not at all sure that pg_lzcompress.c is safe. If we were
aggressively trying to avoid patent risks we might well consider
dropping pg_lzcompress.c and using zlib exclusively.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
