"Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > True random data wouldn't be such a great test either; what would > probably be best is a set of random words, since in real life you're > unlikely to have truely random data.
True random data would provide worst-case compression behavior, so we'd want to try that to find out what the downside is; but we shouldn't consider it to be the design center. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org