In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Martijn van Oosterhout <[email protected]> writes:
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:00:22AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>> > T-SQL has statement-level triggers, and they get used a lot (some big apps
>> > ONLY put code in triggers). Statement-level triggers are very efficient
>> > for
>> > maintaining aggregates; the closest PG has are rewrite rules.
>>
>> Yeah, I wish PostgreSQL had them. I've got clients that could certainly
>> make use of them.
> What are you referring to that is not supported currently?
Probably he means that a complete implementation of statement-level
triggers should include a way to access the rows affected by the
trigger call.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
