Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: > I implemented a basic implementation using pg_lzcompress. It appears > that pg_lzcompress is very, very slow. I was afraid that I'd made an > infinite loop, but it was just really slow. Mind you, the overhead of > each call might have been the problem, it was being called on every > 32KB block.
Something wrong there, because the entire point of pg_lzcompress was to be pretty fast. I agree it needs looking into. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly