Ok, this way works and the proposed way isn't necessary.
On 5/24/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"John Jawed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I guess I don't understand what one has to do with the other (SRF's
> returning records and OUT parameters). I always thought they were exclusive,
> could you elaborate?
(BTW, please don't post uselessly HTML-ified mail.)
If you write something like
create function foo (in p1 int, out r1 int, out r2 text)
returns setof record
then you've effectively got a function returning an anonymous composite
type (here, with one int and one text column). I don't see a case for
inventing a separate facility that will pretty much just duplicate this
functionality.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
