On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 04:55:07PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What I'm looking for is what "\d" provides you, only limited to a > > specific schema. "\d information_schema." (for example) doesn't provide > > that; it provides the details for every table/view in > > information_schema. > > What you're looking for is \dt, or perhaps \dtsv or one of those forms.
\dtsv produces exactly what I'd want/expect. > I'd be the first to agree that the behavior of \d isn't particularly > orthogonal, but it's not the pattern language that's the problem, it's > the command itself. Perhaps \d without an argument should just do whatever \dtsv does? -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
