On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 04:35:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > ... The main objection I see to this is that it replaces a kernel > call that actually does some work with a kernel call to start a timer, > plus possibly a later kernel call to actually do the work. Not clear > that there's a win there. And ofcourse it's an almost guarenteed loss on systems that don't require a syscall to set the proc title.
Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
